Are Voting Rights Act protections still necessary? The court was right to strike down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act / The court should not have struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act / The Congressional Voting Rights Amendment Act is vital / The Congressional Voting Rights Amendment Act is a bad idea / Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is vital / Are states restricting voting rights? Supreme error / North Carolina is protecting the integrity of voting / Why Pennsylvania's Voter ID Law is unconstitutional / Winning the fight for Voter-ID / Texas is not restricting women's right to vote / How do voting rights apply to particular groups? Encouraging immigrants to vote strengthens democracy / Fraudulent voting by illegal immigrants is a serious problem / Voter fraud is not a serious problem / Felons should be enfranchised / What Holder isn't saying about letting felons vote / Birthright / People with mental disabilities should have the right to vote / Incompetent voters should not be allowed to vote / Can changing voting procedures promote fairness and equality? A bipartisan path to fixing America's broken elections / Partisanship will prevent equitable voting reform / Bilingual ballots protect voting rights / Bilingual ballots are unnecessary and can lead to fraud / The stakes of Florida's special election / Restrictions on early voting are discriminatory / Ranked-choice voting in Minneapolis has contributed to inequality / Ranked-choice voting in Minneapolis has not contributed to inequality